Undergraduate Journal of Political Science
The California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is our department's scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include American politics, public administration, international relations, comparative politics, public law and political theory. The Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is a student-run journal.
Senior Editor-in-Chief 2021:
Natalie Kassar
Junior Editor-in-Chief 2021:
Nicolas Hernandez-Florez
Faculty Advisors:
Dr. Neil Chaturvedi (nschaturvedi@cpp.edu)
Dr. Elli Menounou (emenounou@cpp.edu)
Current Issue: Volume 5, Issue 1, Spring 2021
Previous Issues:
Previous Editors:
- 2020: Sandra Escobar and Natalie Kassar
- 2018: Kristen Khair and Samara Renteria
- 2017: Tara Kwan and Kristen Khair
- 2016: Tara Kwan
Editors Natalie Kassar and Nicolas Hernandez Florez, in addition to faculty advisors Dr. Chaturvedi & Dr. Menounoum, introduce this volume of the undergraduate journal.
Women compose 51% of the American population, but only 23.7% of the seats in the United States Congress are held by women. This paper will analyze how sexism and gender stereotypes in the news media portray female politicians at the Congressional level. Frequently, the news media’s targeting does not emphasize their political agenda, instead the media platforms resort to sexist remarks and stereotypes that perceive women to be incompetent for office, while they portray men as competent. Previous scholars have concluded that the media often mention female politician’s character and emotional traits (Van Der Pas & Aaldering, 2020, pg.119) along with associating them with “feminine issues” compared to “masculine issues” (Hayes et al., 2014, pg.1197). For this study, the data was retrieved from live news broadcasts and articles that were analyzed in order to determine how often they made sexist remarks or stereotypes toward congresswomen. The quantitative data will be categorized on how often the media references a congresswoman’s character or emotional traits, family or appearance references, and associating them with “feminine issues” compared to “mascuine issues.” This study found that the media mentions a congresswoman’s political agenda over her appearance and family role, but they continue to reference them with negative character traits and “feminine issues.” These results could potentially explain why female politicians struggle to have positive perceptions from the electoral public as well as why there is a persistent gender gap in Congress.
This research project poses the question: Why are contemporary Latin American anti-government protests occurring? The time frame that will be analyzed will start from 2005 and will look at Nicaragua’s 2018 protests and Chile’s 2019 protests in order to try and answer this question. Researchers and scholars have put forth different theories that explain why citizens protest against their government and theories regarding mobilization. There are four distinct categories in which each of these explanations can be placed in: social factors, political/institutional factors, and finally, economic factors. The explanations within the social factors categories are loosely connected and related to the psychological and social factors of protest explanation. The political/institutional, economic, and technological factors within their respective categories are all interconnected and build compounding explanations. These four main categories embody the main literature that seeks to answer why protests against the government occur. The research’s findings would support the notions put forth in the explanations that revolve around the existence of opposition groups; opposition groups are a necessary factor for the proliferation of anti-government protests.
Counterterrorism and counterinsurgency have been widely debated subjects amongst security scholars in terms of best practice and rate of success. Scholars have found best-practice methods regarding both approaches, but heavily debate as to which is more advantageous in curbing global terror and insurgency and whether these results are replicable. This study engaged in a multifaceted approach in analysing counterinsurgency and counterterrorism strategies to determine when these methods find success, and whether success is replicable on a generalised scale or is region and context specific. Using case studies in Iraq, Afghanistan and Malaya, the goal was to analyse what factors led to their successes and whether they were idiosyncratic or mutually generalisable for a variety of conflicts. This study fills in the gap created by previous scholars and establishes a direct understanding of counterinsurgency and counterterrorism in terms of strategic best practice. Consequently, this study reveals the nature behind the factors that lead to successes in the war on terror and global insurgency, with the goal of aiding future security policy.
Visiting a neighborhood park, utilizing a local trail, or taking advantage of other recreational spaces seem like simple, uncontroversial activities. The distribution of public parks and green space is not an issue that many urban dwellers often think about. Yet, as with many contemporary issues in the United States, the distribution of public parks highlights a history of racial discrimination, environmental racism, and unequal health and education outcomes. As the United States’ second-most populated city, one would hope that Los Angeles possesses enough recreational space for all its residents. However, most parks and other green spaces are concentrated in wealthy, majority-white neighborhoods, or in country clubs with a high economic barrier of entry. This creates a gap in public health, education, and general quality of life. Through tax reform, focused public policy, and increased funding for social oriented projects, the inequity of park distribution in Los Angeles can be a thing of the past.
The research performed examines how business improvement districts (BIDs) contribute to the gentrification of historic urban ethnic enclaves, focusing specifically on the marketing goals of BIDs in Los Angeles Chinatown. BIDs have encouraged economic development and revitalization through marketing, security and cleaning, employing marketing tactics of touristification, boutiquing or upscaling, and other measures that drive up the neighborhood value. While there is praise for BIDs for helping economic growth in certain areas, oftentimes the consequences of their actions have led to gentrification and forced displacement of traditional small business own- ers and residents, changing the character of the neighborhood. In 2020, there is an added layer of complexity in BID activities as COVID-19 has devastated many businesses in the area. A qualitative analysis will be performed on the social media of the BID working in Los Angeles Chinatown, analyzing their posts in 2016 and 2020 regarding marketing and target demographics.