Undergraduate Journal of Political Science
The California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is our department's scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include American politics, public administration, international relations, comparative politics, public law and political theory. The Undergraduate Journal of Political Science is a student-run journal.
Senior Editor-in-Chief 2020:
Sandra Escobar
Junior Editor-in-Chief 2020:
Natalie Kassar
Faculty Advisors:
Dr. Neil Chaturvedi (nschaturvedi@cpp.edu)
Current Issue: Volume 4, Issue 1, Spring 2020
Previous Issues:
Editors Sandra Escobar and Natalie Kassar, in addition to faculty advisor Dr. Chaturvedi, introduce this volume of the undergraduate journal.
As the largest system of public higher education in the country, the California State University (CSU) system has for decades served as a testing ground for some of the most relevant developments in higher educational policy. Recent policy developments within the system however has led to a multitude of speculations surrounding its actual objectives. The purpose of this study is to examine the question of to what extent the implementation of Executive Order 1110 impacted the student success levels of Underrepresented Minorities (URM) within the CSU system. In order to approach this question, the different factors conforming to the concept of student success in higher education is first analyzed and defined. Following the establishment of this central concept, this study gains a more meticulous and precise understanding on the effects of this policy, by conducting a sample survey at one of the largest and most diverse campuses within the CSU system. Prima facie results from this data-based analyses indicate a various effects on the levels of college success among URM students. Effects that according to the same data, can potentially expand as more students from these specified groups continue to experience the effects of this policy.
Ethnic conflict towards Sikhs has been a reoccurring issue in India and Pakistan following the separation of Pakistan. Most Sikhs reside in Punjab, India but Pakistan also conflicts with Sikhs, in fact, most diverse minority ethnicities experience conflict within the state. The theoretical explanations concerning ethnic conflict against Sikhs ultimately fall into four variables: events of disobedience or secessionism, economy, culture, and institutions. However, the literature on the Sikh ethnic conflict has resulted in multiple inconclusive attempts to use a single variable to determine an answer. Hence, this thesis uses a process tracing line of action to test the four variables in the two Sikh conflicted states; Pakistan and India. In its testing of different social contexts in each of these two cases, this method allows this thesis to analyze these variables to ultimately distinguish the effects of these four variables.
The achievement gap among public school students in the California education system has reached an unprecedented level, directly resulting from the current public-school finance system. This paper argues that this finance system is reflected in the relationship between taxation and educational achievement in both affluent and poor communities. The achievement gap is symbolic of injustice and unfairness and results from the unequal finance system. Using qualitative analysis, this paper argues that the level of school funding impacts students’ performance on the SAT, thereby affecting their chances of attending a university. The research also asserts that the inequality between wealth and poverty does not change across California’s various geographic areas nor according to each school district’s ability to provide high-quality education, unless the funding system is different from each school district. Therefore, there is little to no chance for students, who are not already at the top, to move up the social ladder. Thus, the education finance system is the gateway to unequal K-12 schools in California
The purpose of this research is to see how immigrants in the United States were treated and what obstacles the immigrant groups had faced depending on their immigration statuses in the United States. This study will find an answer to the research question: How does unequal treatment impact and affect immigrants based on immigration status? The goal of this study will help determine the impact these treatments have towards immigrant groups and what obstacles have affected the immigrant groups from being treated equally.
In this study, a contrast is made between two counterterrorism strategies used by westernised nations: hard power, consisting of the use of decisive military action, and soft power, consisting of diplomatic strategies and building relationships with the locally affected communities. These approaches are critically analysed to answer the question of: which counterterrorism strategy is most effective? Both approaches are examined through a normative and pragmatic lens, analysing their successes and failures throughout the recent years. The results of this study yield that only through the combination of both hard and soft power can counter terrorist professionals effectively prevent major attacks and destroy international terror threats.
Recent reports have suggested new terror groups particular to the MENA region have embarked on new efforts to recruit women into their organizations. Although the phenomenon of women engaging in terrorist activity dates back centuries, this kind of deliberate recruitment does not. This study takes stock of prejudices about men and women worldwide, that have served to profit such groups in penetrating security mechanisms currently in place. The landscape of gender inequities among the countries most threatened by terrorist activity—in combination with the weight of push and pull factors relative to women–outlined by notable female security experts, is examined. The resulting data concludes the new emergence is unique and potentially sustainable, contributing to the discourse challenging myths that generalize men as perpetrators and women as victims in addition to identifying breaches in security through culturally induced stereotypes.